Sport Integrity Australia – A New and Unified Approach to Tackling Threats to Australian Sport

The Federal Government has recently established a national sports integrity commission to act as a single platform for coordinating Australia’s response to sport integrity threats across all jurisdictions. Doping, match-fixing and corruption will be targeted by the soon-to-be-formed Sport Integrity Australia. The commissions will also provide policy and program support to smaller and emerging sports.

The formation of Sport Integrity Australia is an endorsement of one of the major recommendations of the Review of Australia’s Sports Integrity Arrangements (Review), commissioned by the Turnbull Government in August 2017 and published on 1 August 2018, that a national sports integrity body was essential to combat growing threats to Australian sport.

How will Sport Integrity Australia work?

Whilst the specific workings of Sport Integrity Australia are unknown at this stage, the Government intends for the body to operate as an umbrella organisation for sports integrity in Australia.

The Review recommended that Sport Integrity Australia have a broad remit and that it work with “state and federal regulatory authorities and law-enforcement agencies, including the ASC (Sport Australia), Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA), the Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission, the Department of Home Affairs, state/territory and national gambling authorities and sports commissions, and other agencies”[1]. It is hoped that this level of reach and collaboration will ensure Sport Integrity Australia is equipped to deliver a “coordinated national response to sports integrity threats”[2] in Australia.

As Australia’s national body under the authority of the Australian Government, Sport Integrity Australia will be well equipped to liaise with “international sports controlling and regulatory bodies, as well as with international law-enforcement agencies in all aspects of sports corruption.”[3]

ASADA and the Sports Betting Integrity Unit, an arm of the National Integrity of Sport Unit, will both be given increased funding and powers to investigate integrity threats and corruption claims before being absorbed by Sport Integrity Australia.

What powers will Sport Integrity Australia Have?

There is uncertainty around the breadth of powers that Sport Integrity Australia will have once it is formally established. One thing that is for certain is that, if imbued with the powers recommended by the Review, Sport Integrity Australia would have status as a law-enforcement agency rather than a watchdog.

One of the recommendations of the Review is that Australia becomes a signatory to the Council of Europe Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions (Malcolin Convention), which would then allow the Government to enact national match-fixing criminal legislation (similar to those currently operating in NSW). Committing to the Malcolin Convention would provide “an additional solid foundation of Constitutional authority to legislate a suite of measures at the national level,”[4] in turn affording Sport Integrity Australia the powers to regulate sports wagering, administer a national sports wagering scheme and collaborate with intelligence agencies for the purpose of information sharing.

The Review also recommends that the effectiveness of Sport Integrity Australia would be enhanced if it was afforded broad powers to:

  • collect and use information within the ambit of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) without a person’s consent, particularly material alleging criminality;
  • collect, analyse and refer intelligence for a broad range of sports integrity issues to law enforcement in criminal matters and to sporting bodies for a potential code of conduct issues;
  • oversee and administer the proposed amendments to the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority Act 2006 (Cth), which include amendments to facilitate better information sharing, offer greater statutory protection for National Sporting Organisations and empower the ASADA CEO with a broader scope to exercise discretion when sanctioning lower level athletes;
  • liaise with professional sporting bodies about illicit drugs use and samples; and
  • administer a whistle-blower protection framework.

How will Sport Integrity Australia interact with Governing Bodies?

Various news outlets have reported that some of the bodies that will be absorbed by Sport Integrity Australia have already approached a number of Australia’s major sporting codes, including the AFL and NRL, about surrendering information and intelligence on the illicit drug use of players who fail tests. Coupled with Sport Integrity Australia’s proposed access to government intelligence of organised crime, this information would allow collaboration between Sport Integrity Australia and sporting governing bodies to work together to protect players and sporting codes from match-fixing. This level of interaction will presumably be enhanced as the scope of the law-enforcement powers of Sport Integrity Australia are finalised and brought into force.

Moving Forward

While Australia is generally regarded as haven taken a proactive approach to combatting sports integrity issues to date, the purported scope of the powers of Sport Integrity Australia reflects the Government’s position that combatting sports integrity issues requires a nationally coordinated approach. Government departments, law-enforcement agencies, sporting organisations and athletes will all be required to work in conjunction with Sport Integrity Australia. How that all plays out remains to be seen.

If you would like to inquire about our services, please contact us here.

[1] Wood AO QC, J, Howman CNZM, D & Murrihy, R, Report of The Review of Australia’s Sports Integrity Arrangements, 1 August 2018, page 10

[2] Ibid.

[3] Wood AO QC, J, Howman CNZM, D & Murrihy, R, Report of The Review of Australia’s Sports Integrity Arrangements, 1 August 2018, page 11

[4] Wood AO QC, J, Howman CNZM, D & Murrihy, R, Report of The Review of Australia’s Sports Integrity Arrangements, 1 August 2018, page 8

The Australian Sports Commission – Mandatory Governance Principles

The Australian Sports Commission (the ASC) released the Sports Governance Principles in 2002 (revised in 2007 and 2012) as a response to the increased importance of governance practices in the performance of sporting organisations. In 2013, seven highest funded sports were required to comply with the Mandatory Sports Governance Principles (the Principles). In 2015 the …
Read more

Essendon, AFL, ASADA and WADA – what is it all about?

Yesterday the Court of Arbitration for Sport handed down its Panel decision in World Anti-Doping Agency v. Thomas Bellchambers etc al., Australian Football League, Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (CAS 2015/A/4059). This post is a brief explanation of what has gone on in this disappointing saga of Australian sport involving one of the oldest and most …
Read more

Brumbies in Crisis

At what point does it become obvious that an organisation is in crisis and that urgent action is required. The litany of governance issues which have beset the Brumbies organisation in the last 12 months reads like a fiction story.  That these are real events in the history of a great organisation is a demonstration …
Read more