The ‘Emojini’ is out to the bottle: The use of emojis in a legal context

28/08/2026

As technology continues to evolve, the law must adapt to new forms of communication and interaction. One emerging issue is the legal significance of emojis, the symbols and images commonly used in digital correspondence. While often regarded as informal or light-hearted, emojis are increasingly being scrutinised in legal disputes and may have consequences that extend beyond casual communication.

Australian courts have already considered the use and interpretation of emojis in various contexts. A particularly noteworthy international decision is the Canadian case of South West Terminal Ltd v Achter Land & Cattle Ltd [2023] SKKB 116, which raises important considerations for Australian businesses and legal practitioners.

In South West Terminal Ltd v Achter Land & Cattle Ltd [2023] SKKB 116, a court found that a thumbs-up emoji (👍) constituted acceptance of a contract. After receiving a photograph of a signed contract and a request for confirmation, the defendant responded with a thumbs-up emoji. When the defendant later failed to perform the agreement, the court examined the parties’ history of informal business dealings and concluded that the emoji communicated acceptance of the contractual terms.

In reaching its decision, the Court was satisfied that the essential elements of a binding contract were present:

  • an offer had been made by one party;
  • the offer had been accepted by the other party;
  • the parties intended to create legal relations; and
  • that intention was supported by consideration.

Although the decision is not binding on Australian courts, it highlights an issue that may become increasingly relevant as digital communication continues to replace traditional methods of correspondence. Should a similar dispute arise in Australia, courts may find the reasoning persuasive, particularly where the surrounding circumstances demonstrate an intention to enter into a legally binding arrangement.

The case also serves as a reminder that courts will generally consider the objective meaning of communications within their broader factual context. An emoji that may appear innocuous or informal could, in certain circumstances, be interpreted as conveying agreement, approval, or acceptance.

Businesses and individuals should exercise caution when communicating electronically. In contractual negotiations or other legal matters, emojis should be avoided. Clear and unambiguous written responses remain the best way to avoid uncertainty and unintended legal consequences.

The lesson is simple: in the right circumstances, a thumbs-up may mean much more than “message received”.

Changes to SCHADS Award 2010 classification structure

22/07/2026 Over a year after the Fair Work Commission (FWC) first released their initial decision in the Gender-based Undervaluation – Priority Awards Review, the Expert Panel has now handed down their final decision on changes to the Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award (SCHADS Award). The decision is the result of multiple …
Read more

Parental Leave for Casual Employees

For casual employees the unpredictability of their employment can be a major source of stress as often casual employees miss out on many of the entitlements that full-time and part-time employees enjoy. For many, this concern is further exacerbated when they learn that they are about to become a parent. It should therefore be of …
Read more

Purchasing an Off-the-Plan Property

The interest in “off-the-plan” properties is ever increasing and is becoming more popular for buyers. An off-the-plan purchase is one where the Buyer enters into a contract to purchase a property that has not yet been constructed. Due to the prolonged settlement period for an off-the-plan purchase it is imperative for buyers and sellers to …
Read more